When talking about Immanuel Kant in class, we discussed his three
main categories of philosophy. They were:
·
Logic
·
Physics
·
Ethics
As
logic being one of the main categories of philosophy, he describes it as a
formal area of investigation. To be more specific, it is characterized as laws
of thinking. It is based on a priori, which
means that it is independent of experience. Rational thinking is often associated with
this part of philosophy. It can also be described as non-empirical, or not
based on experience.
The
second category of philosophy is physics. Kant described this as a formal area
of study, or to be more precise, laws of nature. Based on his beliefs, no one
can be rationally immoral or irrationally moral. Those are both gross contradictions
since you can’t be thinking logically (rational) when you commit an immoral
action. This category of philosophy is empirical, meaning that experience is
required to confirm the principles. Nowadays, physics is a study of the laws of
matter and energy, which could only be proven through experiments and
observations.
The
third category of philosophy, as defined by Kant, is ethics. He describes it as
a formal area of inquiry, and as the laws of morality. It is both empirical and
a priori, which is actually possible
despite many people’s beliefs. In order to formulate the principles of ethical
philosophy, experience is not needed. Therefore, it is a priori in this aspect. On the other hand, in order to prove these
principles, experience is required, making this aspect empirical. Any morally
good action is done solely for the sake of duty (deontos; Greek). Kantean philosophy is known as deontology because
of this. In order to determine the duty with which morally good actions should
be done, one must go through a priori ethics.
I really like how Kant broke down the 3 main branches of philosophy because understanding each branch individually is definitely a better way of learning it rather than trying to mix them all together. As far as his views go, he thought that rational behavior was very important, which we went over during class on Wednesday. I was a bit confused with how Kant differentiates empirical and a priori (non-empirical) then goes back to ethics for determining moral laws as empirical a priori, but your clarification on it definitely cleared it up a bit for me.
ReplyDelete